sturmmann said: www.theage.com.au/
We are a doomed human race.

sturmmann said: www.theage.com.au/

We are a doomed human race.

J-San said: Yeah that's terrible, and disturbing. I just hope in our generation, we'll get to see at least some proportion of this racial garbage die down and dissapear.

I guess it's wishful thinking, but I do hope so, for everyones sake.

Jeffie said: have you seem that ross kemp series on gangs, on 7hd? they showed the russian nazis...

S0NY said:
Are you Jewish....

Loupek said: meh, when a guy with a swastike in his avatar is commenting on skinheads kicking the stuffing out of people in russia you know we are in a sad state of affairs

Jeffie said:what relevance does that have?

SOME GUY, LOL:You're only as old as you act...

Loupek said: meh, when a guy with a swastike in his avatar is commenting on skinheads kicking the stuffing out of people in russia you know we are in a sad state of affairs, on the plus side, at least no-one has blamed videogames, lol

S0NY said:

Jeffie said: have you seem that ross kemp series on gangs, on 7hd? they showed the russian nazis...

Are you Jewish....

Gaetano said: What's quite humorous is that the one place on the planet that is the pure "essence" of Hitler in Berlin is so unbelievably anti-Nazi and anti-Hitler it's not even funny. These people worship a man who was clearly delusional and whose support came from the Berlin people. Yet, his main followers despise him. It's illegal in Germany to deny the holocaust and I was amazed at how emotionally driven that city is. There are countless people who walk the street with Nazi-symbol badges and a big cross over it. It's just funny that the place where his power was most influential he is unspoken of, but people all of the world still worship him. Germans are actually embarrassed. They shouldn't be, but they are so anti-Nazi it's not even funny. How disappointing it must be for them to see a group that they started but now despise so strong in other parts of the world.

rivalZone said: Actually, I'm not sure if he supports it or it's just a joke but most National Socialists do not condone violence, a real National Socialist would look down on this type of behaviour. Swastika*

Half of you idiots don't even know what you're talking about.

rivalZone said:
And in regards to Germany starting it, Hitler made it the power that it was and he's Austrian, not German.

the_doctor said:

rivalZone said: Actually, I'm not sure if he supports it or it's just a joke but most National Socialists do not condone violence, a real National Socialist would look down on this type of behaviour. Swastika*

Half of you idiots don't even know what you're talking about.

What are you a neonazi? I can't stand it when people call others idiots. Almost all national socialists in Germany believed strongly in Nazism, and as such anything with that sign stresses racial purity - which is in fact what is so ironic about his post and what I believe Loupek was commenting on.

Gaetano said: ... it's just not socially acceptable

Gaetano said:

rivalZone said:

And in regards to Germany starting it, Hitler made it the power that it was and he's Austrian, not German.

The Germans embraced Hitler before the Austrians did.

And free speech is not as broad as people make it out to be. Free speech goes as far as political correctness. If someone protests outside state parliament saying "murder should be legal", they can't argue free speech because it's just not socially acceptable to say something like that. Same with the holocaust.

10letters said:

Gaetano said: ... it's just not socially acceptable

sigh @ the humanism, remember who made the rules...

rivalZone said: Now we're going off topic. But someone should be able to protest for Pro-Murder if they want to and as far as "political correctness" goes, we are in no position to say if murder of a 8 year old baby is wrong. Not saying I support it but because I certainly do not but in a system of "majority rules" and the majority are, to say it bluntly, a pack of idiots, why is it wrong? But that's not for this topic.

Gaetano said:

10letters said:

Gaetano said: ... it's just not socially acceptable

sigh @ the humanism, remember who made the rules...

That doesn't even make sense...especially considering what I posted. It's not just black and white. I'm not a humanitarian, but how could anyone argue FOR murder or AGAINST any of the laws that our society is based on is silly.

Gaetano said:

rivalZone said: Now we're going off topic. But someone should be able to protest for Pro-Murder if they want to and as far as "political correctness" goes, we are in no position to say if murder of a 8 year old baby is wrong. Not saying I support it but because I certainly do not but in a system of "majority rules" and the majority are, to say it bluntly, a pack of idiots, why is it wrong? But that's not for this topic.

Wow...just...

wow...

rivalZone said: I know what Luopek was meaning but most National Socialists (political) these days are clean cut people that don't go around bashing people like on American History X and Romper Stomper. That's not to say that people don't do that, most Nazis these days do go around beating at people's skulls because of their racial heritage. If you and Luopek understood my assumption with sturmmann's post, you would not be defending in such a way.

rivalZone said: In your opinion it's silly but the slaughter of aboriginal people when Australia was first established was almost a sport but that has since changed. Murder was not always looked down on and in 100 years time, a law that you consider "rightful" could be considered fine.